A
series of revisions to production targets will result in lower oil output from Iraq than
originally planned.
On 4 September, Iraq reached
an agreement with BP and the Chinese oil company CNPC to lower the planned
production target for Rumaila, the country’s largest oil field. The agreement
is not a one-off—it is part of a series of revisions to the targets that had
been originally agreed on with international oil companies in 2009. The
revisions will lead to a sharp fall in Iraqi oil output relative to the
original unrealistic plans.
The BP/CNPC deal
does not come as a surprise. For months international oil companies have been
negotiating lower production targets for the fields they run. ExxonMobil agreed
with the Iraqi government on a lower production target for the West Qurna-1
field. Lukoil did the same for West Qurna-2. Likewise for Eni and CNPC, the
operators of Zubair and Halfaya, respectively. Only Shell is yet to agree with
the Iraqi government on a new output target for the Majnoon field. It is
lobbying for a reduction from 1.8 million barrels per day (mb/d) to only 1.o mb/d, but
the Iraqi government is holding out for 1.2 mb/d. (The table below provides a
summary of the original and revised production targets by field.)
Such broad
revisions to the original agreements indicate a flaw in the way the contracts
had been awarded. The process involved oil companies submitting bids
specifying: (1) production target (the peak level of output the company would
eventually produce from the field); and (2) remuneration for developing the
field and reaching the target. Iraq then chose the bids with the highest production targets (since they result in more revenue) and lowest fees (less cost). But as
pointed out by James Hamilton, these auctions
encouraged oil companies to exaggerate production targets in order to win the
contracts. Once awarded, they began negotiating lower targets to move from “propaganda
to the reality”.
What does the new
reality hold for Iraq? The path of future Iraqi oil production will be
significantly lower than originally planned. Instead of producing 11.0 mb/d
from the six fields listed in the table above by 2020, Iraq has to settle for
only 7.2 mb/d. And even this target looks overly optimistic. To achieve it,
Iraq has to be more stable and efficient in the next six years than it has been
in the last five.
The production
loss is even bigger if we include the fields of Qayara and Nejma, which were
projected to add 230 kb/d by 2020. Sonangol, the Angolan company which had won
the contract to develop them, pulled
out of the country in February due to deteriorating security situation. The fields
are now under the control
of the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham, and there is
little hope for production growth from either of them.
Finally, while
BP/CNPC were not alone in negotiating a revised production target, the agreement
unusually included raising their shares in Rumaila. BP’s share increased to 47.6%
and CNPC’s to 46.4%, while Iraq’s stake was reduced to 6%. Iraq had previously maintained
a 25% share in all oil fields, and it is not clear whether this reduction is
unique to the BP/CNPC agreement or if it also applies to the other revised
deals. Iraq might be moving from propaganda closer to reality, but transparency
is still in short supply.